Posted On: October 21, 2008

ARE VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER’S PERSONAL VEHICLES CONSIDERED AUTHORIZED EMERGECNY VEHICLES UNDER NEW YORK LAW?

The simple answer is no. Emergency vehicles in New York are defined as police vehicles or bicycles, ambulances, fire, corrections and civil defense emergency vehicles as well as sanitation patrol vehicles, emergency response vehicles, certain vehicles of the United States Armed forces and hazardous materials emergency vehicles. VTL § 101. Vehicle and Traffic Law section 1104 permits the above mentioned emergency vehicles to disregard certain traffic laws and regulations when involved in an emergency operation. VTL § 1104.

However, with the exception of police vehicles, the other emergency vehicles are only exempt from the traffic laws and regulations if they are traveling with an audible signal as well as at least one red light (if more than one light, at least one must be red) visible from at least 500 feet. VTL § 1104(c). For obvious reasons, police vehicles are exempt from the siren and lighting requirements. The driver of a police vehicle nevertheless still must drive with due care and may not proceed recklessly.

The above listed vehicles found in VTL § 101 are the only emergency vehicles authorized the disregard certain traffic laws and regulations (provided they do so with due care and not in a reckless manner). A member of a local volunteer fire department therefore, may not equip his or her vehicle with lights and sirens and declare it to be an emergency vehicle thus allowing him or her to disregard traffic laws and regulations while traveling to a fire. Nicosia v. Shultis, 239 A.D.2d 473, 658 N.Y.S.2d 640 (2nd Dept. 1997).

If you have been injured in a car accident with an emergency vehicle, contact the law firm of Tilem & Campbell. You should contact an attorney immediately as there are strict time limitations for filing certain necessary documents when you are suing a municipality such as New York City, White Plains, New Rochelle, Pelham, the Village or Town of Mamaroneck or any other municipalities. However, you should know that when involved in an accident with an emergency vehicle travelling to an emergency situation, the driver of that emergency vehicle will not be deemed liable unless he or she operated the emergency vehicle with a reckless disregard for the safety of others. This is a more difficult standard to prove then the mere negligence standard applicable in accidents involving non-emergency vehicles.

Posted On: October 17, 2008

New York Criminal Defense Team on the Pulse 87.7 FM

New York Criminal Defense Lawyers John Campbell and Peter Tilem appeared on the Star and Buc Wild Morning Show yesterday morning and sat in on the show from 8 am until 10 am. The Star and Buc Wild Show, which is featured on the Pulse 87.7 FM, has hosted the pair in the past and had them back yesterday to talk about criminal law and particularly drug crimes, gun crimes, traffic violations, traffic misdemeanors, and DWIs.

Many callers called in to ask their legal questions and many more who could not get through on the radio station phones called Tilem & Campbell at 888-ANY-CRIME to speak to the lawyers. "We even got a call from an NYPD Narcotics Detective who called in to talk about cooperating with the police," according to Peter Tilem.

Although the Star and Buc Wild Show is no longer on the Pulse, Peter Tilem and John Campbell have been asked back to appear on the Pulse in the near future.

Posted On: October 8, 2008

New Tork Traffic Ticket Lawyers Tilem & Campbell Announce New Web Page

New York Traffic Ticket Lawyers, Tilem & Campbell are please to announce the posting of their newest web paging entitled "New York City Traffic Tickets". The page is designed to be a primer of the practices of the New York Traffic Violation Bureau Courts (TVB) that operate in New York City, Rochester, Buffalo and parts of Suffolk County. If you receive a traffic summons in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, Manhattan or Staten Island in New York City it will be returnable to the Department of Motor Vehicles and be adjudicated in a TVB. The New York City Traffic Ticket page will educate you about the practices and procedures of these administrative courts.

The page is broken up by heading with topics such as "The Hearing", "Entering Your Plea" and "The Rules of Evidence at the Hearing" and more and therefore should be a simple reference for any questions realting to New York City Traffic Tickets.

If you receive a traffic summons in the City of New York or any other area that is covered by the TVB please refer to the "New York City Traffic Tickets" page or contact us at 877-DR SUMMONS. Keep in mind that the TVB only handles traffic infractions and not traffic misdemeanors or other types of violations.

Posted On: October 1, 2008

NEW YORK CRIMINAL DEFENSE FIRM CHALLENGES MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCES IN FEDERAL CRACK CASES

New York criminal defense firm Tilem & Campbell has filed Court papers seeking to prevent the use of mandatory minimum sentences in federal crack cases. Citing the reasoning in the recent Supreme Court decision, Kimbrough v United States that permitted Federal District Courts to consider the "100-1" ratio when considering whether or not to sentence below the federal sentencing guidelines in crack (or cocaine base) cases, Tilem & Campbell asked the Courts to take the ruling one step further and declare the mandatory minimums unconstitutional. The "100-1" ratio refers to the fact that under the current federal sentencing scheme, an offender sentenced for cocaine base is likely to get roughly the same sentence as a person sentences for 100 times as much cocaine.

The Supreme Court in Kimbrough found that this "100 -1" ratio was unwarranted based upon the fact that cocaine base (crack) and cocaine are two forms of the same drug with the same active ingredient and the same physiological and psychotropic effects. In addition, citing statistics from the United States Sentencing Commission, the Supreme Court indicated that there was a racial disparity with minorities and in particular African-Americans receiving longer sentences for crack offenses than their white counterparts who were committing cocaine offenses.

Tilem & Campbell filed the challenges in both the US District Court for the Southern District of New York and the US District Court for the Eastern District Court and decisions are awaited from both Courts.

For more information about the latest developments in Federal crack sentences please subscribe to this blog or contact one of our experienced Federal criminal defense lawyers at