Close

Articles Posted in NARCOTICS

Updated:

New York Supreme Court Refuses to Suppress Drug Evidence Seized in a U.S. Mail Package

Law enforcement agencies are prevented from performing unreasonable searches of members of the public or their property by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. These constitutional protections extend to areas where a person has an expectation of privacy, including items that have been mailed through the U.S.…

Updated:

Court Addresses Defendant’s Waiver of His Right to Appeal in New York Drug and Gun Possession Case

New York drug and gun offenses and convictions can have long-term repercussions, including lengthy prison sentences. Defendants must understand their rights after being arrested, charged, or convicted of a criminal offense. Additionally, it is vital that defendants understand the typical steps of a New York criminal case. Including, arraignment, pre-trial…

Updated:

Court Finds Officers Lacked Probable Cause to Stop Defendant in Recent New York Drug Dealing Case

Earlier this month, a state appellate our released an opinion in a New York drug case in which the defendant was alleged to have sold cocaine. The defendant claimed that the evidence obtained as a result of his arrest must be suppressed, because it was obtained in violation of his…

Updated:

What Is a New York Eavesdropping Warrant?

Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued an opinion in a New York drug case, affirming the defendant’s conviction. The court’s opinion, although brief, discusses what has come to be known as an eavesdropping warrant. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects all individuals against unreasonable searches…

Updated:

New Your Court of Appeals Discusses the Standard Required for an Officer to Make a Traffic Stop

A state appellate court issued an opinion in a New York gun possession case, last month,  requiring the court to determine if the police officers were justified in stopping the defendant’s vehicle for a traffic violation. Ultimately, the court concluded that the officer lacked any basis to believe that a…

Updated:

New York Court Condones Stop of Defendant’s Vehicle Based on Tip from Confidential Informant

Earlier this year, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a New York drug possession case involving the defendant’s claim that a stop and search of her vehicle violated her constitutional rights. Ultimately, however, the court determined that the search was supported by reasonable suspicion, rejecting the defendant’s…

Updated:

New York Court Discusses Validity of Search Based on Defendant’s Admission to Possessing Synthetic Cannabinoids

Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a New York drug case discussing the validity of the search that resulted in the discovery of narcotics. The case required the court to discuss the protections afforded by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and…

Updated:

New York Court Finds Inexperienced Officer Lacked a “Founded Suspicion” to Stop, Question, and Search Defendant

Last month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a New York gun possession case discussing whether the arresting officer had a “founded suspicion” that there was criminal activity afoot. Ultimately, the court held that the defendant’s motion to suppress the firearm that was found on him should…

Updated:

Supreme Court Issues Opinion Impacting New York Defendants with Prior Drug Convictions

As we reported in February, the Supreme Court heard argument on  a drug case that will likely have significant consequences for many facing New York gun charges.  Now, the United States Supreme Court issued a written opinion  in the case.  Specifically, the case required the Court to interpret the provision…

Updated:

New York Appellate Court Reversed Trial Courts Denial of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress

Earlier this month, a state appellate court issued a written opinion in a New York drug possession case discussing the defendant’s motion to suppress. Specifically, the defendant appealed the lower court’s denial of his motion to suppress arguing that the arresting officer’s pat-frisk of the defendant was illegal. Without answering…

Start Chat