Covid-19 Update: At Tilem & Associates our lawyers are committed to protecting your rights, serving our clients and keeping you safe.

New York Appellate Court Upholds Murder Conviction Over Defendant’s Challenge to Admission of His Statement

Recently, a state appellate court issued an opinion in a New York homicide case involving a defendant’s appeal of his conviction. The defendant appealed the lower court’s decision to admit his statement to police in the moments after the murder. However, the appellate court found that there was no error in admitting the statement. The court further explained that, if there was any error in admitting the statement, doing so was harmless.

The Facts of the Case

The defendant was alleged to have killed another man, whom he met out on the street around 2 a.m. According to the court’s opinion, the defendant was drinking beer with friends. Throughout the evening, the defendant expressed some violent thoughts, and discussed his gang membership.

Evidently, shortly before 2 a.m., the defendant got into an argument with the victim, which led to a fistfight. As the victim turned to leave, the defendant chased him. The defendant stabbed the victim in the chest and, as the victim fell, repeatedly kicked him in the head. The victim died as a result of the stab wounds.

When police arrived, one of the officers asked, “what happened?” The defendant explained that the victim had provoked him and that the officers should obtain the surveillance camera footage to verify his story. The defendant was arrested. Upon his arrest, his blood-alcohol content was more than twice the legal limit.

At trial, the defendant’s theory was that he was too intoxicated to form the intent to kill, which is a required element of a New York murder charge. The prosecution’s case consisted of testimony from five eyewitnesses, security footage, evidence of the defendant’s intoxication, and testimony regarding the defendant’s gang affiliation. The defendant was convicted and sentenced to 23 years to life.

The defendant appealed the admission of his statement to responding officers, arguing that it was taken without him being read his Miranda rights. However, the court rejected the defendant’s claim. The court explained that, Miranda warnings are required when a defendant is subjected to “custodial interrogation.” Here, the court skipped over the custody analysis, finding that the officer’s question “what happened?” was not an interrogation, but an attempt to “clarify the situation.” The court also held that, even if it was an error to admit the statement, the statement was not harmful to the defense. Thus, any error in admitting it was harmless.

Have You Been Arrested After Making a Statement to Police?

If you made a statement to police that you wish you could take back, do not give up hope. Police officers routinely ignore the constitutional requirements that surround taking suspects’ statements, and the statement you made may be inadmissible at trial. At the law firm of Tilem & Associates, we represent clients facing all types of serious criminal charges, including New York homicide offenses. We have decades of hands-on experience handling every aspect of a case, from arrest, to a motion to suppress, all the way through trial. To learn more, and to schedule a free consultation, call 877-377-8666 today.

 

Contact Information